<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wonder Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dianawunderle.com/wonderblog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dianawunderle.com/wonderblog</link>
	<description>influence of fine art, fine art of influence</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The influence of fine art and the fine art of influence by Pat Ratliff</title>
		<link>http://www.dianawunderle.com/wonderblog/?p=5#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Ratliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dianawunderle.com/wonderblog/?p=5#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Very timely topic, I hope this discussion can flourish.
Re:That said, a picture is still worth a thousand words.
It was Paul Theroux who changed one word and respoke the phrase:
A picture is ONLY worth a thousand words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very timely topic, I hope this discussion can flourish.<br />
Re:That said, a picture is still worth a thousand words.<br />
It was Paul Theroux who changed one word and respoke the phrase:<br />
A picture is ONLY worth a thousand words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
